Forum    Search    FAQ

Board index » Chat Forums » General Chat




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1739 posts ] 
 
Author Message
 Post Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:58 pm 
Gatekeeper of Niftiness
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:16 am
Posts: 9081
Location: Praise be to the sticky elastic bands of the Healing Gauze
I don't normally speak for others, but in this case I'll make an exception. No one here is interested in overweight Pokemon furry fans. At least I hope not, anyway.

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 3:48 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:13 pm
Posts: 132
WLM: [email protected]
Location: Norway
Kajin wrote:
I don't normally speak for others, but in this case I'll make an exception. No one here is interested in overweight Pokemon furry fans. At least I hope not, anyway.


Rule 34.1: If it exists, someone is turned on by it.

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:22 am 
Member of the Fraternal Order of the Emergency Pants
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 12:00 am
Posts: 3167
AOL: drachefly
Location: Philadelphia, PA
I'm turned on by triplets...

... of integers which, when taken to a third or higher integer power, sum to zero.


~~~~

By the way, it's not at all rule 34 on MLP, but I did encounter a humorgasm when it was suggested that if SG1 were running today, Teal'c would be a brony, at least a few toss-off lines worth.

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 3:40 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:00 am
Posts: 11381
drachefly wrote:
I'm turned on by triplets...

... of integers which, when taken to a third or higher integer power, sum to zero.


Aside from the trivial case of zero, zero and zero, that's impossible (assuming that all three are to be raised to the same power). The proof is trivial for even powers (an integer to an even power is always positive), but the odd-numbered case is too long to fit into this post.

If I'm allowed to raise some of them to different integer powers, then I can find examples.

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:04 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:43 pm
Posts: 710
CCC wrote:
drachefly wrote:
I'm turned on by triplets...

... of integers which, when taken to a third or higher integer power, sum to zero.


Aside from the trivial case of zero, zero and zero, that's impossible (assuming that all three are to be raised to the same power). The proof is trivial for even powers (an integer to an even power is always positive), but the odd-numbered case is too long to fit into this post.

If I'm allowed to raise some of them to different integer powers, then I can find examples.

Technically speaking, it doesn't have to exist to be turned on by it.

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:13 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:09 pm
Posts: 5432
Website: http://grillick.blogspot.com
WLM: [email protected]
Yahoo Messenger: Giltaras
AOL: Giltaras
Location: Brooklyn, NY
CCC wrote:
The proof is trivial for even powers (an integer to an even power is always positive), but the odd-numbered case is too long to fit into this post.

Very cute, Pierre. It would have been better if you had said "The proof for the odd-numbered case is marvelous, but this post is too small for it."

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 5:22 pm 
Member of the Fraternal Order of the Emergency Pants
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 12:00 am
Posts: 3167
AOL: drachefly
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Dangit, I was trimming it down and forgot to require them to be nonzero. I think I had 'distinct' in there, but replaced it with something else. Oh, right. I rephrased it down from 'sets of three integers' to pick up the triplets pun. Set of three would have been unambiguous... at least if we understand sets don't contain duplicates.

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 11:00 am 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:00 am
Posts: 11381
I see no reason why a set of three items should not contain duplicates, if it has not been specified as a set of distinct items.

"Distinct integers" or "nonzero integers" would have been unambiguous, though. It'd even work with "nonzero rational numbers".

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:39 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:13 pm
Posts: 132
WLM: [email protected]
Location: Norway
I've found out that, even though I'm fairly good at both the english language and math, it's pretty hard when you mix those together!

(I'm Norwegian..)

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:48 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 1437
Location: Department of obvious temporal physics!
CCC wrote:
I see no reason why a set of three items should not contain duplicates, if it has not been specified as a set of distinct items.

Because that's what a set means to mathematicians. Elements are in, or not. They use other words for things that can contain duplicates, like "triplet".

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:19 pm 
Gatekeeper of Niftiness
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:54 am
Posts: 5115
Location: Australia
Science explained by dots.

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:33 pm 
Admin of Slight Inconvenience
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:07 pm
Posts: 6067
Location: Someplace other than where I am.
Perspective is the ____

...and the site won't let me put the URL without it altering it to "poop". Okay then.

http://perspective.isthe (put s-word here) .net/

Disclaimer: Contains the s-word in URL and page.

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 7:01 am 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 4577
Location: Destroying the world.
http://www.necessarygames.com/my-games/loneliness/flash

Interesting little thing.

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 2:49 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:27 pm
Posts: 73
Website: http://auros.livejournal.com/
Location: San Mateo, CA
Somebody's been giving contracts to Dr. Schlock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1gcwTXm7oE

Top 
   
 Post Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:00 pm 
Member of the Fraternal Order of the Emergency Pants
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 12:00 am
Posts: 2994
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you The Red Hot Chili Pipers.

Top 
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1739 posts ] 

Board index » Chat Forums » General Chat


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: