Forum    Search    FAQ

Board index » Sluggy Related Forums » Reactions




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 
 
Author Message
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 8:47 am 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 196
Location: The Frozen Tundra
Okay, Pete confirms it: alt-zoe is dead, not just bleeding under the stone and crawls out into the DoP to come back in another story arc. Good, that's one less female vying for Torg's attention (and could we get back to Riff's romantic escapades now?).

No, Pete! Don't go down that road. "Msny of you got it right."?!?!?!?! Awww man, your George Lucasing all over yourself. Please, understand. Viewers don't get things right or wrong, the artist does. If the viewers don't get something, then you haven't made it clear.

Top 
   
 Post subject: Re: Huh
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 9:35 am 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 4:04 pm
Posts: 263
BenSerwa wrote:
I don't see how people didn't get that. I got all of it right away.


Well we're french. And it still doesn't make sense at all even with the emphasis on saying Horribus. None of us got it after 20 minutes of discussing the darn thing. I suspect some obscure cultural difference is involved making the comment meaningless to some people and obvious to others.

Anyone care to play Noam Chomsky to clear that strip up for me a bit more? (-;

Top 
   
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 11:00 am 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 12:00 am
Posts: 3
Website: http://www.craigsniffen.com
WLM: [email protected]
AOL: MasterSlowPoke
Location: Tampa
Horribus didn't make a promise to keep AltZoe safe, Torg did. Horribus didn't fail at keeping AltZoe safe, Torg did. The purpose behind slaying Horribus at that time would have been vengence, not redemption. To redeam would be to make better. Horribus's death wouldn't have a different affect than stalling him. Torg realised that the path to redemption was up the pile. Zoe was redeamed when her death powered up the sword and prevented a possible deathblow to the diminished Goddess.

Top 
   
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 11:14 am 
Evil Game Minister of DOOM!
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 16202
ICQ: 6954605
Website: http://krellen.net
Yahoo Messenger: shinarimaia
AOL: TamirDM
Location: The City in New Mexico
MasterSlowPoke wrote:
Horribus didn't make a promise to keep AltZoe safe, Torg did. Horribus didn't fail at keeping AltZoe safe, Torg did. The purpose behind slaying Horribus at that time would have been vengence, not redemption. To redeam would be to make better. Horribus's death wouldn't have a different affect than stalling him. Torg realised that the path to redemption was up the pile. Zoe was redeamed when her death powered up the sword and prevented a possible deathblow to the diminished Goddess.

Actually, Torg decided against redemption. Killing Horribus simply because he killed Alt-Zoë would have been Vengeance - punishing for wrong-doing. Killing Horribus to make up for Torg's failure to protect Alt-Zoë would have been Redemption (and the statement "Horribus didn't promise to keep her safe" marks his charge as a quest for Redemption - he wanted to make some sort of payment to "make up for" his failure).

Vengeance is an outside search, to punish people that have done wrong (justly or unjustly). Redemption is an internal search, to repay yourself for your failure - Mosp went for redemption, saving Torg and fighting Horribus to make up for her betrayal eons ago. Torg took the third path, the path of heroes, and went to save the one he still could. He got neither vengeance nor redemption; he concluded that redemption was overrated.

Top 
   
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 12:04 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:57 pm
Posts: 42
Location: The little voices in my head say I'm crazy, but I don't believe them.
I got the redemption vs. vengenance right away, but I hadn't thought of the "path of heroes." Strong stuff there.

Top 
   
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 12:49 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2002 12:00 am
Posts: 2687
Website: http://www.livejournal.com/users/quadrophenic86/
Yahoo Messenger: styx326
AOL: drummeronthemoon
Location: pat-puh-patpat
You see? Pete reads these, children! Be nice and you might get quoted...

Top 
   
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 5:00 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 62
Website: http://www.purpletomato.org
AOL: MandyDaKitty
Location: Behind you!
Good job, trying to clear it up for those us us who were confused. Thank you. And it's good to know Zoe-2 is dead, dead. :zoe: Kil lthe spec before it starts!

Top 
   
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 7:44 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 84
I'm not disagreeing with anyone, I don't think, just putting it in my own words. (like to "hear" myself "talk" I guess)

Quote:
"Horribus didn't promise to keep her safe."

That's the key to that sentence: the emphasis that should be there but is missing. He means: I am the one who promised to keep her safe, and failed. (I had to ponder that one too.)


My 2 cents- "Horribus didn't promise to keep her safe."- i.e. killing him is in no way punishing or correcting Torg's failure to protect alt-Zoe, and therefore can in no way redeam him of anything. She'll still be dead if Horribus becomes as such, and, in fact, not exercising his violent passions on Horribus was in fact more likely to be 'punishing' to Torg (emotionally).

EDIT: Put the I back in DIsagreeing (the first one no less)

Top 
   
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 12:25 am 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 4:04 pm
Posts: 263
Quote:
"Horribus didn't promise to keep her safe."

That's the key to that sentence: the emphasis that should be there but is missing. He means: I am the one who promised to keep her safe, and failed. (I had to ponder that one too.)


I understood the redemption and vengeance thing right away, but the "Horribus didn't promise to keep her safe" is still eluding me completely as well as some friends. The other 6 poings have stopped trying and settled for "Pete makes nifty sense exactly 365 days a year even on leap years" or something.

Top 
   
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:35 am 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 196
Location: The Frozen Tundra
drummer_dude wrote:
You see? Pete reads these, children! Be nice and you might get quoted...


Bring it on. I stand by my remarks. If your most loyal and annoying fanatics can't readilly get what you are trying to say, the what chance do your casual viewers have? I loved the story, I hope the strip can do high drama again sometime, but there are always going to be spots where you have to try really hard to make sure other people understand what is going through your head about what the characters are doing/thinking.

Top 
   
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 7:51 am 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 500
Yahoo Messenger: oikapuff
AOL: PikaPuff00
Location: Hawaii. Haha! *points at you and laughs*
relax wrote:
Quote:
"Horribus didn't promise to keep her safe."

That's the key to that sentence: the emphasis that should be there but is missing. He means: I am the one who promised to keep her safe, and failed. (I had to ponder that one too.)


I understood the redemption and vengeance thing right away, but the "Horribus didn't promise to keep her safe" is still eluding me completely as well as some friends. The other 6 poings have stopped trying and settled for "Pete makes nifty sense exactly 365 days a year even on leap years" or something.
It means:

"I was the one that made the promise to keep Zoe safe. Horribus was not the one that promised to keep Zoe safe."

Top 
   
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:18 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 660
Well, most of the fanatics did figure it out, though. And really, the fact that we had to think about it to get it made it better for me, not worse. The comic wouldn't have been half as effective if Pete had just told us the point he was trying to make.

Top 
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 

Board index » Sluggy Related Forums » Reactions


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: