I turn in my $(token), and state my belief that something has the drachefly nature if it is manufactured.

I believe that a flying fish has the Steave nature.

For every facet I know about Bill Clinton (which isn't much) there is someone who exhibits the same facet in the list of people who do not have the Grillick nature. I pronounce myself stumped on the Grillick nature, probably due to insufficient knowledge. However, I shall continue to make guesses in a semirandom manner, in the hope of providing a clue for someone more knowledgable.

Does an ostrich have the Grillick nature?

Ah - a placid lake has Drachefly nature, yet it is not manufactured.

(have: socket wrench, laptops, placid lake
have not: tree, top of one's lap)


I'm stumped on Grillick nature too.

We're on page 10. You guys seem to be enjoying the game, so we could start a new thread if you like.


The Master nods and gives a small bottle of sand to CCC. "A heated argument does have the AT nature."

SUMMARY
Has: love, anger, joy, T-rex, The Hanging Gardens, a heated argument
Has not: fence post, logic

An Ostrich lacks the Grillick Nature. In fact, all non-humans do.

Has:
Teddy Roosevelt
Bill Clinton

Lacks:
Ostrich
Non-Humans
Augustus Caesar
Superman
The New York Giants
George Washington
Bill Gates
Thabo Mbecki
Barack Obama
Jacob Zuma

I believe that Ronald Reagan has Grillick nature.

I believe Rachmaninov's 2nd symphony has AT nature. Does Canyonlands National Park have AT nature?

Concerning new threads - there's no waiting period? Or is that rule waived due to overall low activity?

If I remember right, you can start a second thread immediately if you want, but a third thread requires a waiting period. I'll go ahead and start a new thread.

New thread? No fair. I was winning!

Oh, I intended to keep this current game going in the new thread. Which is here, by the way.