migB wrote:
Pied Typer wrote:
The ISS had no armor earlier than 2007. Which means that it survived 9 years without it.
NASA is known to be "better safe than sorry" so I don't think the armor upgrade means that there is an overwhelming risk of collisions in the short run.
One hole was found after 9 years of operation, so I wouldn't think twice about taking a one-day trip in an inflatable spaceship.
As I also stated, the ISS generally tends to get out of the way of asteroids that its armor won't soak up. Also, the article mentions that they were
replacing old armor from 2002.
migB wrote:
Pied Typer wrote:
An asteroid large enough to create 10 cm holes would not be a relatively small asteroid. It would also be large enough to detect and track via radar.
Also, the proper procedure for a hull breach would not be to evacuate the station. The correct actions would be "close the nearest blast doors, then have someone go on EVA to fix it".
No, they don't have tools for that on the station. Also, the REASON they don't have tools for large holes is that the station would decompress so fast that the crew is expected to die before they can seal the blast doors. I read that in an article some years back, NASA could have changed it's mind since of cause.
Actually, I would expect an onboard computer to be able to detect the rapid pressure loss from a hull breach and react accordingly.
And, once again, the ISS tends to get out of the way of the asteroids that can
cause hull breaches in the first place.